Showing posts with label Danny Sheridan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Danny Sheridan. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Top Ten reasons why Cubs fans shouldn’t panic

Look, I like Jim Hendry. He’s one of the better general managers in baseball. After the Cubs won 66 games in 2006, they won 85 and 97 respectively the last two seasons, with a lot of credit going to the moves that Hendry made (the Fukudome signing aside).

But so far, Hendry’s busy offseason hasn’t gone according to plan. While you can’t lay all the blame on him, considering how bad the Cubs’ hitting has been and all the injuries they’ve had to deal with, he deserves his fair share.

With all that said though, it’s only May 26. There’s plenty of time to turn things around. Cubs fans might be panicking right now, but here are 10 reasons why they shouldn’t be.

10. 2007 season

On June 2nd of that year, the Cubs’ record was 22-31. The team was a mess, Lou Piniella was wondering just what he had gotten himself into, and everyone pretty much wrote them off. This Cubs team is a lot better than the ’07 one. It’s a veteran group that understands divisions aren’t decided in April/May.

9. Return of Aramis Ramirez

Who knows when Ramirez will come back, but boy have the Cubs missed his bat in the lineup. At the beginning of the year, Cubs fans knew the one guy they could ill afford to lose for an extended period of time was Ramirez. When he does return, hopefully sometime around the All-Star break, it’s not likely you’ll see the Cubs go through another six-game stretch where they score a total of five runs, like they did this past week.

8. A little adversity might not be a bad thing

Last season, on their way to 97 wins, the Cubs faced no real adversity from April to September. They led the division from early May on, and had only three losing streaks of three games or more. The pressure of going into the playoffs as heavy favorites clearly got to the Cubs, and we saw what happened against the Dodgers.. Being tested this early in the season and having to fight through the dreaded “underachievers” label in May might not turn out to be a bad thing in the end.

7. Lou Piniella

Other than his three years in Tampa Bay, where he was put into an impossible situation, Piniella has won everywhere he has been. He won’t panic or get too worked up about one bad stretch in May, because he knows he’s got a veteran team that is accustomed to dealing with high expectations. But at the same time, Piniella won’t be afraid to start getting on guys who aren’t producing. I just have a hard time seeing a pretty talented team managed by one of the game’s best not figuring things out eventually.

6. Derrek Lee, Milton Bradley and Geovany Soto should all start to hit

If they don’t, well, then the Cubs are in real trouble. Lee has picked it up of late, raising his batting average over .50 points in the last two weeks. Soto, who came into spring training way out of shape, doesn’t figure to keep struggling when you consider that he hit .285 with 23 home runs and 86 RBI last year. As far as Bradley, I hated the signing at the time, so you can imagine what my feelings are right now. Still, Bradley won’t keep hitting under .200 all season. And don’t forget about Mike Fontenot. He showed last season, albeit in a utility role, that he is a solid hitter, so his .208 average should start to rise.

5. Starting pitching

Before last night’s disaster, Cubs starters had the sixth best ERA in the National League at 4.11. While Ryan Dempster hasn’t been nearly as good as last year, he’s still been solid (with the exception of last night), as has Ted Lilly and Sean Marshall. Randy Wells has also had three great starts. The key will be if Carlos Zambrano can start pitching like he did for the first four months of last season. It might not be one of the league’s top rotations anymore, but it’s still good enough for the Cubs to stay in contention all summer.

4. No dominant team in the NL Central

This is shaping up to be a three-team race between the Cardinals, Brewers and Cubs (the Reds don’t have much staying power). The Cardinals and Brewers both have some major flaws, just like the Cubs. Outside of Yovani Gallardo, the Brewers starting pitching is very weak, and Rickie Weeks is out for the year with a wrist injury. The Cardinals are a solid team, better than the Brewers, but their lineup after Albert Pujols and Ryan Ludwick is questionable, and Chris Carpenter is more unreliable than Zambrano or Rich Harden. It will take more than the 85 wins with which the Cubs won the division with in ’07, but it’s not like the teams in front of the Cubs are clearly superior.

3. Everything that could go wrong has already gone wrong

Even when the Cubs were 21-14 before their road trip from hell, they weren’t playing very good baseball. You figured that the baseball gods wouldn’t be as kind to them this year, and they haven’t been. Ramirez, Zambrano, Lee, Harden and Bradley have all missed time due to injury. Breaks that the Cubs got last year haven’t gone their way so far this season (the Cubs are 2-7 in one-run games). The lineup has been a mess, with Fukudome the only regular hitting over .300. And yet where do the Cubs sit this morning? One game below .500, five games out of first. Not bad when you consider all that has gone wrong.

2. The hitters should come around eventually

Like Lou Piniella said after last Saturday’s game when asked about the team’s offensive struggles: “We’ll get out of this. We’ve done it before. Are we the best offensive team in the National League? Absolutely not. Are we down at the absolute bottom? No. We’ve got to basically find our medium somewhere, and we will. It’s just a question of when and how soon.” After leading the National League in runs scored, batting average and on-base percentage last season, the Cubs rank in the bottom five in the NL in all those categories this year.

1. Who cares?

Didn’t we learn our lesson last fall? Cubs fans put their heart and soul into the team for six months, only to have it all end in four days in October. What’s the point of ever again getting too high or too low during the regular season if you’re a Cubs fan? You know the team is just going to disappoint you in the end anyway. Panic if Jay Cutler fails to meet expectations or if Derrick Rose tears his ACL playing in a pickup game over the summer. But don’t waste time and energy worrying about the state of the Cubs. It’s just not worth it.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Top Ten Bears under the most pressure

Even though their season opener is almost four months away, there is no such thing as an offseason in this city when you’re talking about the Bears. And because of some guy named Cutler, who we’ve been told is a pretty good quarterback, the excitement level going into this season is the highest it has been this decade.

On paper, the Bears look a lot better than last year’s 9-7 team. But there are still a lot of questions marks, questions that will need answers if the Bears want to have the kind of season that people are anticipating. With the first day of organized team activities starting today, here are 10 guys who are under the most pressure to perform.

10. Adewale Ogunleye
The Bears had only 28 sacks last year, which tied for 22nd in the league. Ogunleye had a career low five sacks, and there were too many games where he hardly got within five feet of opposing quarterbacks. There’s a reason why the majority of experts say that a pass rushing defensive end is the most critical component in a top defense. Having a great pass rusher makes it a lot easier for your secondary, and it doesn’t require you to blitz your linebackers and safeties as much. With Mark Anderson having fallen off the map, and Alex Brown never being known as a pass rusher, Ogunleye needs to produce for the Bears’ defense to get back to the level they once were at.

9. Whoever plays free safety

With Mike Brown gone, someone from a pool of Craig Steltz, Josh Bullocks and Danieal Manning needs to fill his shoes at the free safety position. That’s hardly an intimidating trio, and when you consider that starting strong safety Kevin Payne is still very much unproven, the Bears better hope that letting Brown go, not drafting a safety until the sixth round, and trading away Chris Harris two years ago don’t all come back to haunt them.

8. Chris Williams

The Bears need to find out what they have in Williams, their first-round pick from a year ago who missed most of last season with a back injury. They apparently felt confident enough in him to not re-sign John St. Clair and to not lose sleep over John Tait’s retirement. Williams doesn’t need to be a star, just a consistent performer at right tackle.

7. Jerry Angelo

Yes, Angelo finally broke free from his ultra-conservative approach and acquired the franchise quarterback that the Bears had been missing since, well ever. No matter how Jay Cutler turns out, Angelo needs to be commended for giving the Bears a chance to become an elite team and giving the city something to get excited about. And signing Orlando Pace, who Scout.com ranks as the league’s 7th best offensive tackle (when healthy), was a great move as well.

But what about the receiving position? Does Angelo really feel confident going into next season with Earl Bennett, who has zero career catches, as his number two receiver? Torry Holt would have fit in perfectly with the team, but Angelo didn’t show much interest in him. Anquan Boldin, Braylon Edwards, and Plaxico Burress are all available in a trade, but again Angelo doesn’t appear to be intrigued by any of them.

6. Nathan Vasher

Is Vasher the player that made the Pro Bowl in 2005 and intercepted eight passes or is he the guy who, due to injuries, has played a total of 12 games these last two years? No one is really sure right now. He’s clearly on the hot seat, in serious danger of losing his starting spot to Corey Graham. It appears the Bears are giving him one more chance to prove he can get back to being the playmaker that he was his first three years. Two years ago, Vasher and Charles Tillman were considered one of the top five cornerback tandems in the NFL. Tillman has kept up his end of the bargain, so now it’s up to Vasher to bounce back.

5. Devin Hester

Remember back in training camp last year when Hester held out for two days, not happy with his $445,000 salary? It scared Bears fans to think what life would be like without Hester returning kickoffs and punts, after he had taken back 13 kicks for scores his first two years in the league. Now, after watching Hester look totally lost last year on his returns and eventually being replaced on kickoff duties by Manning, Bears fans are more concerned with whether Hester can develop into that number one receiver Cutler desperately needs. He showed signs last season, but on every other team in the league, Hester would be no better than a number two, and on more than half the teams, a number three.

4. Tommie Harris

After Jay Cutler, you could make a reasonable argument that Harris is more important to the Bears than any other player. When he was playing at an all-pro level in 05’ and 06’, the Bears were the best defense in the league. Although Harris has a combined 13 sacks these last two years, his impact has been minimal at best. It’s time for Harris to prove that he can stay healthy for an entire season and justify his $40 million dollar contract. If he can regain the form that once had people touting him as one of the game’s most dominant defensive players, it would take a lot of pressure off the rest of the defense.

3. Lovie Smith

This offseason, Smith has axed defensive coaches like Donald Trump has fired people on The Apprentice. Now, with Smith taking over the play-calling duties on defense, we will find out how much Bob Babich really was to blame for the unit’s performance the last two years. People quickly forget that Smith is a combined 42-26 these last four years despite having so much instability at the quarterback position. With very high expectations this season, anything less than a division championship may not be enough to save Smith’s job.

2. Brian Urlacher

It’s pretty simple really for Urlacher: make plays. Last season, Urlacher had zero sacks, a career-low 93 tackles, zero forced fumbles and two interceptions. That won’t cut it from a guy who has better than a 50/50 shot of making it to Canton. It’s probably unrealistic to expect Urlacher to get back to his NFL Defensive Player of the Year award level from 2005. But as a point of reference, compare him to Ray Lewis, who is four years older. Lewis found his fountain of youth last season, and proved that even at 34 he is still one of the game’s best middle linebackers. Urlacher needs to follow a similar path.

1. Jay Cutler

Expect Cutler to face more pressure in this town than any athlete since Michael Jordan. How will Cutler handle the scrutiny that comes with that? We won’t know for a while, but you know how Bears fans are: a couple bad games from Cutler early in the season and the Rick Mirer comparisons will begin. Cutler makes everyone around him better: Matt Forte won’t be seeing nine guys in the box anymore, Hester and Greg Olsen should both make more big plays downfield, and the defense will get more rest, when you consider that the Bears had the third-highest percentage of three-and-outs in the league last year.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Top Ten reasons to be both a Cubs and White Sox fan

It’s never easy for me to talk baseball with someone for the first time, because eventually I’ll get asked the dreaded question: “so are you a Cubs or Sox fan?” When I quietly reply “both,” usually the person will just look at me strangely, as if I just admitted to being a follower of Satan. Then, one of two things inevitably happens: they’ll lecture me about how you have to pick a side, or they’ll go “oh” and quickly change the subject.

Meanwhile, tonight I’ll be equally as interested in how Clayton Richard does in his first start of the season as I will be with which Cub hitters will pick up the slack for Aramis Ramirez.

10. Broadcasters

Cubs fans hate Hawk because he’s a homer/complainer/know-it-all. Sox fans don’t like Len and Bob because they work for the Cubs and they’re not Hawk. In reality, both announcing crews are great in their own way. Hawk is entertaining, brutally honest, and his catch phrases, all 50 or so of them, never get old. Steve Stone knows the game of baseball inside and out, and serves as the perfect compliment to Hawk. Len and Bob are as solid as they come, and know how to let the game come to them without forcing it.

9. Enjoy both ballparks

Wrigley has the ambiance and tradition, while the Cell has convenience and comfort. Plus, if you go to both ballparks frequently enough, you can decide for yourself which team has the better fans, and not go by what Barack Obama thinks. Although there’s nothing like seeing the Cubs win a day game at Wrigley, I’d give the advantage overall to the Cell for three main reasons: you actually have room to move around, the food is a lot better, and parking is way easier.

8. Crosstown Classic World Series


While there’s zero likelihood it will happen this year, or probably any year for that matter, what if it did? To die hard Sox fans, losing to the Cubs would seem like the end of the world. There’d be no getting over it. Same goes for Cubs fans if they lost to the Sox. For someone like me, I’m covered either way. In fact, the big party would be the day both teams clinch spots in the World Series, because then I can’t lose. If I had to pick a side, I’d root slightly for the Cubs, but only because the Sox won it all just four years ago.

7. Screw loyalty

Why should I keep cheering for a team if they continually suck? So I’m a bigger bandwagon jumper than a lot of current Blackhawks “fans.” You know how many Sox or Cubs players I’ve ever spoken a word to or have gotten within 50 feet of in my lifetime? Zero, which is probably the same answer for most of you reading this. I have no connections or close affiliations with either team, so I don’t owe it to one particular team to remain loyal through the down times. At the end of the day, a good percentage of these same players we root for care more about how much money they make than what name is on the front of their jersey.

6. No jealousy

It had to be very painful for Cubs fans to see the Sox go on their magical 11-1 run through the playoffs in 2005, just like it would be for Sox fans if the Cubs ever break their 101-year curse. At the moment, Sox fans are able to laugh at Cubs fans because they have something the Cubs don’t, a recent championship. When the Sox lost in the ALDS to the Rays last fall, South Siders could at least take great pleasure in the Cubs’ complete collapse against the Dodgers. Rooting for both teams totally eliminates the jealousy factor.

5. Managers

Having Ozzie Guillen and Lou Piniella manage in the same city is awesome. There hasn’t been a better combination in Chicago since Jordan and Pippen. If I could sit down and meet any two current sports figures in Chicago, players included, I might choose these two, Guillen for sure. The day the Cubs signed Piniella, they became serious contenders. The day the Sox signed Guillen, they became relevant and fun to watch again.

4. Have something to watch in the summer

From the end of the NBA Finals the first week in June to the start of the NFL season in early September, there’s nothing going on in that three month window besides baseball. So if the Cubs were 10 games out already by the time school let’s out, it’s going to be a pretty boring and depressing summer sports wise for Cubs fans. It makes for a lot more interesting summer overall when your baseball team is in contention, and, last year obviously being an exception, that’s usually only been the case for one of the two teams. The Cubs were all but eliminated from contention by summer in 2005 and 2006, the Sox in 2003 and 2007.

3. Root for good stories on both sides

So far, most of the surprises on both sides of town haven’t been good, when you consider Geovany Soto, Milton Bradley, and Alexei Ramirez’s batting averages, all the Cubs’ injuries, and the fact that Scott Podsednik has started eight games in the outfield for the Sox. But last year, there were a bunch of great stories for both teams, the big two being the emergence of Carlos Quentin and Ryan Dempster. However, many Cubs fans wouldn’t appreciate or even acknowledge how great Quentin was before he got injured, because they were too caught up in all the “this is the year” talk, and also were jealous that Kenny Williams stole him from Arizona while Jim Hendy shelled out big money for Kosuke Fukudome. Likewise, a lot of Sox fans didn’t cheer for Dempster because he came out of nowhere to give the Cubs one of the best rotations in baseball, while the Sox staff was terrible the last two months and almost cost them the division.

2. Double your chances

Okay, this one is pretty simple, even though I suck at math. If you root for two teams instead of one, you have a better chance each day of seeing at least one of them win a ballgame. Let’s say the Sox lose a tough game, like last week’s extra-innings loss to the Royals for example. Sox fans are going to be pissed off the rest of that night, and probably still thinking about it until the next day’s game. But if the Cubs were to win on that day, well, you may get over the Sox quicker, and therefore have second thoughts about emailing Guillen (ozzieguillen13@hotmail.com) to tell him how much his team sucks.

1. Lack of success in Chicago sports

Since the Bulls dynasty ended in 1998, other than the White Sox World Series title, the Bears' trip to the Super Bowl and the Cubs’ 2008 regular season, there hasn’t been much to get excited about from any of the city’s five professional sports teams. That’s a shame too, because Chicago is a huge sports market with some of the greatest fans in the world. We’ve suffered through so many bad seasons here, that when we finally saw both teams reach the postseason last year for the first time since 1906, I was on cloud nine (unfortunately that feeling lasted all of five days). May I remind you also that the Cubs haven’t won a World Series in 101 years, and up until 2005, the Sox had gone 88 years without one. Not that you probably needed the reminder.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Top Ten Chicago sports media personalities

Don’t worry, this guy is nowhere to be found on here.

10. Jeff Joniak

For the Bears’ first two games in the 2006 playoffs, I put the television on mute and turned on WBBM 780 to listen to Joniak and Tom Thayer. Some of that was just my strong dislike for Joe Buck, but that’s how much I enjoy listening to Joniak call a Bears game. He is fun to listen to, and understands the game inside and out. My all-time favorite line of his has got to be, “Devin Hester, you are ridiculous” after Hester returned two kicks for scores against the Rams.

9. Phil Rogers
Hands down, the best baseball writer in Chicago. His “Around the League” column every Sunday and his Power Rankings every Monday are great-reads. He shows no bias toward either the Cubs or Sox, and also does a nice job of blending in stories about what’s happening in the rest of baseball. Rogers also wrote this really sweet book.

8. Sarah Kustok

Erin who? Just like Joakim Noah, the Bulls/Celtics series was sort of her coming-out party.

7. Stacey King When the Bulls decided to shake things up on their telecasts by letting go of Tom Dore and bringing over Neil Funk from radio, I remember thinking one thing: more Stacey King is never a good thing.

Now, I have pulled a complete 180 and can’t get enough of the guy. Yeah, he’s a bigger homer than “Hawk” Harrelson, but listening to him during the Boston series was awesome. King was so entertaining, I even chose to tune into Comcast over the broadcasts on TNT, which had the great Kevin Harlan and Doug Collins for Games 5-7. My favorite King line, and there were many, from the series: “if you’re scared, go buy a dog.” (said whenever the Bulls blocked a shot.)

6. Marc Silverman Unlike most of the other sports talk shows on WSCR 670 and ESPN 1000, “The Waddle and Silvy Show” comes across as very professional and entertaining. Silverman is always prepared, doesn’t take himself too seriously, and is able to work around Waddle’s sometimes diva persona. And he is truly a fan first and offers great insights from a fan’s perspective.

5. Steve Stone This guy understands baseball like Albert Einstein understood electricity. The one thing I will say though is that Stone is still adjusting to being a fan of the White Sox. Stone hasn’t yet seemed to let go of the Cubs and embraced his new team, which is strange considering he did radio for the Sox last year. With all that said, his analysis and insights pretty much make up for his rather slow transition back to the television side.

4. Sam Smith Smith took his talents to bulls.com after the Tribune surprisingly bought him out last April. The author of the best selling, The Jordan Rules, Smith has so many connections around the league, he even had Shaquille O’Neal calling him out last year after one of his articles. Even though Smith was known to write unbelievable trade rumors without having any sources, it sure was entertaining stuff to read.

3. Len Kasper In my opinion, Kasper is very underrated as a play-by-play man. He can hold a conversation while doing a game, and unlike a certain guy on the South Side, doesn’t let biases get in the way while doing a broadcast. Hard to believe, but back in 2005, Kasper was actually the Cubs’ third choice for an announcer behind Dave O’Brien and the great Matt Vasgersian.

2. David Kaplan It’s not the easiest job in the world to have to try and host a Chicago sports talk show when you have baseball writers talking about the Bears or football writers talking about the Cubs. Kaplan manages to keep the discussions very lively by inserting his own opinions and often stimulating debate amongst the panelists. This guy is versatile enough to be an expert in any sport, although at times he can come across as too much of a Cubs homer.

1. David Haugh Whether he’s writing interesting profiles on Bears players, giving his take on issues surrounding the team, or writing one of his must-read Ten things I know about the Bears columns, Haugh is as good as it gets on the print side in Chicago. His insights and observations are always spot on, and he takes great angles on his stories.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Top Ten questions for the Bulls heading into Game 5

Two months ago, who would have thought that the Bulls would be battling the Celtics (even without KG) for the right to advance to the second round?

This series has had a little bit of everything: three classic games, a great point guard battle between two future stars (though Rondo has clearly won the matchup so far), incredible clutch shooting from a pair of former UConn Huskies, and the drama of an up and coming Bulls team trying to become the first No. 7 seed in the last 11 years to win a playoff series.

With the crucial Game 5 tonight, here are 10 key questions the Bulls must answer if they want to send more shockwaves across the league and get one step closer to pulling off the huge upset.

10. Will Kirk Hinrich, when he’s in the game, keep guarding Paul Pierce?

This may be the most overlooked aspect of the entire series. Even though Hinrich gives up a lot of size and strength to Pierce, he has done a great job when he has guarded him. In fact, the Bulls probably don’t win either Game 1 or Game 4 without Hinrich’s defensive play, not to mention his 18 points on Sunday. John Salmons has done a decent job on Pierce, but he’s clearly limited by his groin injury.

9. Will the Bulls come out with a sense of urgency?
Immediately after the Bulls won Game 4, I said to my dad, “well, you know the Celtics are going to come out pissed on Tuesday, and the Bulls might be a little soft knowing that they stole one.” Then again, I had similar concerns about Game 2, but the Bulls played really well and should have won that one also. One thing we do know is that it’s silly to try and predict how this inconsistent Bulls team will play from game-to-game.

8. Will Ben Gordon go on another one of his shooting sprees? Gordon, who becomes a free agent this summer, is making it real tough on John Paxson. He almost won Game 2 single-handedly, and he kept the Bulls alive in the series with a ridiculous three-pointer at the end of the first overtime on Sunday. For the Bulls to have a realistic shot at beating the Celtics two more times, Gordon has to go off again in at least one of the games, if not both. His unique scoring ability is what keeps defenses honest and opens things up for Rose.

7. Will the Bulls control the defensive backboards? If the Bulls had gotten any defensive rebounds late in Game 2, they’d probably be up 3-1 right now. However, the Bulls did outrebound the Celtics in these last two games. Boston’s shooters are too good to keep giving them second and third chances, so it’s crucial that the Bulls are able to keep Big Baby and Kendrick Perkins off the glass tonight.

6. Will Derrick Rose start going under the screens against Rajon Rondo? It seems pretty simple really: make Rondo shoot jumpers. Sure he has improved his shot, but I’ll take my chances with Rondo shooting 17-footers versus him getting to the basket, which he has done all series. Rose just isn’t playing very smart on defense when he’s trying to fight over the top of the high ball screens. Rondo is the Celtics’ best all-around player and the guy that makes them go. The Bulls, mainly Rose, have to do a much better job of stopping Rondo’s penetration.

5. Will Ray Allen and Paul Pierce both be on? Let’s be honest. If Allen and Pierce are both hitting their shots, the Bulls can’t win. They won the first game because Allen was way off, and almost took the second because Pierce played like he wanted to be somewhere else. And even though Pierce made some big plays late in Game 4, he still finished only 9-of-24 from the floor. When one of the two is off, the Bulls have a chance, because Boston doesn’t have a heck of a lot of other options. But if both are on at the same time, forget it.

4. Will the Bulls start feeling the pressure?

There’s really no pressure on the Bulls. They’ve already done more in this series than anyone thought they would have. That being said, the Bulls seem to honestly believe they can win this series, and they should. In Game 4, they stayed poised down the stretch, even when they fell behind by five points late in the first overtime. Guys like Rose, Noah, and Gordon really don’t seem to get rattled very easily in big games.

3. Will the Bulls limit their turnovers?

We saw what happened when the Bulls committed 16 turnovers in the first half of Game 3. You figure that the Bulls can’t commit more than 15 turnovers to have a chance to win tonight. Outside of Game 3, Rose has been really good, but he is still averaging more than five turnovers in the series so far, while Rondo is averaging less than two.

2. Will Tyrus Thomas be on the bench once again in crunch-time? Hopefully, the answer to that question is yes. The Bulls’ best lineup is Rose, Gordon, Hinrich or Salmons, Noah and Miller. Vinny Del Negro finally seems to realize that Thomas shouldn’t be on the court when the game is on the line. Yes, he did make a few jumpers in overtime in Game 1, but the chances of him doing that again are remote.

One other thing: near the end of regulation on Sunday, did you notice how after Tyrus got a rebound with 16 seconds left and the Bulls up two, he had every opportunity to give it up to either Rose or Gordon knowing that the Celtics had to foul? Instead, he kept the ball and the Celtics gladly fouled him. What we learned from that exchange is that Thomas is a selfish, egotistical player who wanted to be the one in the spotlight shooting the free throws, even though Rose or Gordon would have been a much better option for the Bulls.

1. Will the Bulls have the mental toughness to win another game in Boston? When you’re on the road, the lid on the basket seems a lot tighter, calls go the other way, and falling behind early is a death sentence. Remember, this is a Celtics team that won the title last year playing a Bulls team that has only three guys (Gordon, Hinrich and Miller) who have played significant playoff minutes. The Bulls showed they weren’t intimidated the first two games of this series playing in a hostile environment, but how will they respond when the Celtics make their inevitable run and the crowd gets into it?

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Top Ten Derrick Rose games

Last night wasn’t one of Derrick Rose’s best performances, but as long as he stays healthy, he looks like a future star in this league for years to come. While this list 15 years from now won’t come close to comparing to this guy’s, Rose will likely finish his career as the second or third best player in the Bulls’ franchise history. These are his top ten all-time games, including his high school and college years.

10. vs. Thornton state quarterfinals March 2007 After making the game-winning shot as a junior to win the state title, Rose showed that he and Simeon were in a class by themselves in their first game downstate the next year. It’s rare you see a high school player come close to a triple-double in a downstate playoff game, but that’s what Rose almost did, finishing with 22 points, nine rebounds and eight assists. And that’s with him sitting out the entire fourth quarter because Simeon was up big.

9. at Utah Nov. 24
This game was a sign of things to come for Rose. In the first of several clutch fourth-quarter performances, Rose made a number of huge shots late to keep the Bulls in the game, scoring 12 of his 25 points in the period. The only shot he missed in the fourth turned out perfectly: the ball bounced right to Larry Hughes and he hit the game-winner at the buzzer.

8. vs. Texas Elite Eight This was billed as a matchup of the country’s top two point guards in Rose and D.J. Augustine. It was hardly a fair fight, as Rose’s size and strength was way too much for anyone Texas tried to throw at him. In leading Memphis to the Final Four in a rout, Rose had a great all-around game, scoring 21 points to go with nine assists and six rebounds. He was even better the next weekend (see below).

7. vs. Atlanta Nov. 11 Although it came in a losing effort, Rose’s 26 points, 10 rebounds and seven assists represented his first real breakout game as a pro. This marked the start of a strong stretch of games for Rose, who would go on to average over 19 points on 50% shooting from the floor during the month of November.

6. at Detroit April 13

In a game the Bulls desperately needed to win to avoid the dreaded eight-seed and a matchup with the Cleveland LeBrons, Rose took over in the fourth quarter, scoring 11 of his 24 points. The biggest play came when Rose went the length of the floor to complete a three-point play to tie the game with 42 seconds left. Then, Rose, who also had eight assists and six rebounds, made a big play on defense, blocking a shot to get the Bulls the ball back, and they eventually took the lead on a basket by Ben Gordon.

5. vs. Houston Feb. 28 With his team trailing by 17 points with just under six minutes left, Rose simply took over the game, scoring 13 of the team’s final 23 points as the Bulls ended the game on a 23-3 run. Despite being hounded by Ron Artest, Rose muscled into the lane and made a very tough shot to complete the comeback, giving the Bulls a 104-102 lead with 32 seconds left. He finished the night with 22 points, eight rebounds and seven assists.

4. vs. Oak Hill Academy Jan. 2007
Facing the nation’s top-ranked team that featured notable players such as Brandon Jennings, Alex Legion and Nolan Smith, Rose stole the show. He scored 28 points to go with nine rebounds and eight assists in leading Simeon to a 78-75 upset. Because the game was televised nationally on ESPN, the whole country got to find out just how good Rose was.

3. at Toronto Jan. 14

In the fourth quarter, Rose was just plain ridiculous, scoring 17 of his 25 points in helping the Bulls come from behind. Luol Deng, (remember him?) said afterward about Rose: “Just give him the ball and get out of the way.” Rose also added 10 assists, and who knows, maybe this game will be in the back of Chris Bosh’s mind when he thinks about where he wants to play once he becomes a free agent in 2010.

2. vs. UCLA Final Four
When the stage got brighter, Rose took his game to a whole other level. Against a very good UCLA team that had three players start in the league this year as rookies, Rose made this game his NBA audition by going for 25 points, nine rebounds and five assists. He also held Bruins star point guard Darren Collison to just two points. In the tournament, Rose was spectacular, averaging 21 points, six rebounds and six assists in the six games.

1. at Boston Game 1 Afterwards, Rose characterized his performance as “decent.” That’s like Michael Jordan saying he had a “pretty good” career. Rose will be in a lot more playoff games in his career, but it will be tough to ever top this one. Maybe the two most impressive things from Rose’s game was his going 12-of-12 from the free-throw line as well as making big shot after big shot in the third quarter when the Celtics made their run.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Top Ten most underappreciated Chicago athletes

Last August, I did a list on the top ten most overrated Chicago athletes (that list is subject to change now). So, on the opposite end, here are 10 guys who don’t get enough recognition. Before you read on, I’d like to apologize for having so many Cubs on here (I root equally for both teams, so forget the bias angle).

10. Brad Miller The main reason why the Bulls have made a late season surge was the acquisition of Miller and John Salmons from Sacramento. While Salmons very easily could have been on this list by himself, Miller’s veteran experience has done wonders for this team, especially for Tyrus Thomas and Joakim Noah. And his 13 point and eight rebound average for the month of March have shown that Miller still has something left to offer on the court as well.

9. Ryan Theriot Who led the National League in base hits last season? That would be Theriot. He rarely strikes out, is real sure-handed at shortstop (although he has a weak arm) and hit .307 last year. Still, many Cubs fans don’t seem to be sold on Theriot as the long-term answer at the position. With all the great shortstops in the National League, Theriot gets sort of lost in the shuffle.

8. Matt Thornton You wouldn’t recognize Thornton if he’s not wearing his number 37 jersey. And when you talk about the best setup lefties in baseball, his name rarely gets mentioned. But, with a big thanks to Don Cooper, Thornton has the best stuff of any Chicago reliever not named Carlos Marmol. Last season, he was just filthy, posting a 2.67 ERA and striking out well over a batter an inning. Team USA recognized his value by selecting him for the WBC, so when will the rest of Chicago?

7. Alex Brown
Brown was one of only two Bears on defense, the other being Lance Briggs, who played up to his ability last season. You know Brown’s going to get you close to seven sacks every year, and where he really stands out is the job he does against the run, something Adewale Ogunleye could take lessons on. Another thing that goes unnoticed is the number of holding penalties he draws on offensive linemen. They don’t keep stats for that, but I bet Brown was one of the league leaders in that category last season.

6. Ryan Dempster
Some people might argue that you can’t really be underappreciated when you win 17 games, finish with an under 3.00 ERA, and make the All-Star team, but let me ask you this: if you were to put 100 Cubs fans in a room and ask them who the team’s best pitcher was, how many would say Dempster? I’d guess less than 10, with Zambrano and Harden splitting the majority of the votes. Even though he has only done it for one season, I still don’t understand why more people don’t consider Dempster the Cubs’ ace over the overrated and inconsistent Zambrano.

5. Ben Gordon Here’s maybe the biggest sports myth in Chicago: Derrick Rose is the most important player on the Bulls. No way. It’s Gordon. Think about it: how many games would the Bulls have won this season without Gordon? Probably around 25. I know he doesn’t play very good defense, and he does force a lot of bad shots, but without Gordon’s consistent scoring, the Bulls would be really bad. Re-signing him this offseason is a must, something I never would have thought I’d say as recently as a couple months ago.

4. Duncan Keith On an up and coming Blackhawks team, names like Kane, Toews, Havlat, Sharp, Campbell and Versteeg get the most attention. Now in his fourth season, Keith has quietly turned into one of the league’s best defensemen. He leads the Hawks and ranks fourth in the entire NHL with a whopping plus-33. Keith also is the leader on the team in minutes, and has been a huge reason why the Blackhawks have turned into a contender a year earlier than most people expected.

3. Ted Lilly When the Cubs shelled out 40 million for Lilly, a lot of people were very skeptical, because his career numbers up until that point were along the lines of a number four starter, yet he was being paid like a number two. In his two seasons on the North Side though, Lilly (32-17, 3.96 ERA) has been nothing short of real solid. He’ll never get much recognition pitching behind the Cubs’ big three, but without Lilly these last two seasons, especially in 2007, the Cubs don’t make the playoffs.

2. Robbie Gould Before the Bears traded for some guy named Cutler, Gould was right up there with Matt Forte as the most important player in the Bears’ offense yet he was pretty much taken for granted as fans focused on the team’s offensive struggles at all the other positions.. Gould was one of the few dependable things on this Bears team these last two seasons, hitting 57 of 65 field goal tries, an 87.6% that was good for sixth in the NFL during that span. It’s tough for field goal kickers to ever get their proper due, but Gould has solidified the position after a string of really bad kickers in Chicago ever since Kevin Butler left in the mid-90s.

1. Reed Johnson This is a guy every team would love to have. He won’t hit for much power or steal many bases, but Johnson is a career .284 hitter, can play all three outfield positions and has a knack for coming up with the clutch hit. If the Cubs are going to win their division for a third straight year, they’ll need Johnson to produce like he did last season (.303 BA), because who knows what they’ll get from Kosuke Fukudome over a full season.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Top Ten reasons why no one is talking about the Bulls

I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here by saying that there is very little excitement surrounding the Bulls, even though they are a virtual lock to make the playoffs after missing out last year.

Despite the Cubs and Sox just starting this week and the Bears not playing a game of consequence for another five months, the Bulls have taken a back seat to all three of these teams. Here are 10 reasons why this has been the case.

10. Not an exciting team to watch Now to be fair, there aren’t a lot of NBA teams that are fun to watch, since so much of the game now is throwing the ball into the post and having the other four guys stand around and watch.

But the thing that hurts the Bulls the most is that they don’t have a LeBron, D-Wade, Chris Paul, Kobe, or Dwight Howard type star, or even a second tier guy like Brandon Roy, Paul Pierce, Steve Nash, or Yao Ming.

Derrick Rose is the closest thing they have to a guy where you can say “I love watching him play” and even that is sort of a stretch. And to me, Tyrus Thomas is more maddening to watch than exciting.

9. People still remember the glory days To this day I’ll still watch all those championship videos or tapes of classic games like Game 6 of the ’93 Finals or Game 5 of the ’97 Finals. It will be tough for the Bulls to ever again capture the city’s attention like they did in the Jordan era, no matter how good they might be five or so years from now. Jordan, Pippen and Phil Jackson transcended not only the city, but the entire NBA en route to those six championships.

8. The core from two years ago has taken a big step backwards When the Bulls won 49 games and swept Miami in the first round, the young nucleus of Gordon, Deng, Hinrich and Nocioni looked like one of the best in the league. Now, Nocioni is gone, Hinrich is a backup, Deng is a joke (but still quite wealthy) and Gordon is and always will be the same player he was two years ago.

If you had asked people in October of 2007 what they expected of the Bulls come April of 2009, most would have said they would be one of the East’s best teams. Not too many would have predicted they’d need a late season spurt just to get in the playoffs.

7. The team is non-controversial There’s nothing close to an Ozzie Guillen, Lou Piniella, A.J. Pierzynski, Carlos Zambrano, Milton Bradley, or to a lesser extent, Rex Grossman, on this Bulls team. Vinny Del Negro shows very little emotion, at least publicly, and the team’s best players, Rose, Gordon and John Salmons are all very even keel guys who aren’t going to create major headlines on or off the court.

The closest thing the Bulls have had to a controversy all season was when Gordon reportedly lashed out at Del Negro back in January after being upset about being fined for breaking a team rule.

6. They are three games under .500 This one’s pretty obvious. It’s hard to get too worked up over any team that is 37-40, even though the Bulls have won eight of their last 11 games. They haven’t been over .500 on the year since they were 2-1. And the Bulls didn’t produce their first three game win streak until the middle of March. Up until these past few weeks, the Bulls were consistently inconsistent.

5. They still aren’t close to being a contender And that’s because they are still searching, as they have been ever since Elton Brand was traded, for a consistent inside scorer. Sure, Salmons and Brad Miller have both provided a much needed spark and have helped the Bulls get over the hump and into the playoffs.

But this is what most people see when they look at the Bulls: a future star point guard, and then a bunch of spare parts. If the Bulls want to generate some serious interest, Paxson needs to pull a Jerry Angelo and trade for Chris Bosh this summer.

4. People think the Bulls have underachieved this season I can’t understand why some people feel this way. If anything, the Bulls have overachieved this year. At the beginning of the season, if you had said the Bulls would finish right around .500 and make the playoffs, I think most people would have been very happy with that.

Also, the East has been much better than in year’s past, so that makes the Bulls’ record even that much more impressive. Taking a close look at the roster, this is not a real talented team. Bottom-feeders Toronto, New Jersey or even Milwaukee (when healthy) have more individual talent than the Bulls.

3. Jay Cutler I wanted to do a post about Cutler, but then I thought, what could I write that hasn’t been said or written about him already? It’s not everyday that an NFL team trades for a young Pro Bowl quarterback who has the ability to change the direction of the franchise. This is first and foremost a Bears town, no matter how well Chicago’s other teams are doing. Adding Cutler only gives people more reason to start dissecting the Bears five months before their season starts.

2. Cubs and Sox getting underway All I can say about this is, thank god. Reading the same boring articles every day for the last month and a half on the Cubs and Sox has made me cringe. Here’s something the other day that bugged me: in the sports section of Sunday’s Sun-Times, the Bulls’ crucial win over the Nets got just a brief game story towards the back. By comparison, the Cubs and Sox had five pages combined all to themselves, including a long story on how Carlos Quentin is quietly driven to succeed.

1. The Bulls will lose big in the first round anyway Regardless of whom you think would be the best matchup for the Bulls, the Cavs, Magic or Celtics (my personal choice), one thing is fairly certain: they will be lucky to take two games from any of these teams in a best of seven series.

Everyone realizes that the Bulls making the playoffs just means that Del Negro and John Paxson get to keep their jobs and that the Bulls can say they are on the right track after missing the playoffs the year before. The playoff experience for Rose would be the only positive that I can see.